Planning appeal decision
Beecher Acoustics Ltd, 1 Quarry High Street, Headington, Oxford, OX3 8JT
Planning appeal 3292360 at Beecher Acoustics Ltd, 1 Quarry High Street, Headington, Oxford, OX3 8JT (Oxford City Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 6 January 2025 by Inspector Perkins L, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the matters stated in the notice (if they occurred) constitute a breach of planning control, ie the ground (c) appeal.
• Without planning permission, erection of 6 x 1 bedroom dwellings in a 3-storey terrace (“the Mews Building”), alterations to the existing access and formation of 9 car parking spaces on the Land
- Authority
- Oxford City Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Perkins L
- Postcode
- OX3 8JT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the matters stated in the notice (if they occurred) constitute a breach of planning control, ie the ground (c) appeal
- If ground (c) is not successful, whether planning permission ought to be granted for the breach of planning control alleged, ie the ground (a) appeal
- If ground (a) is not successful, whether the steps required by the notice exceed what is necessary to remedy any breach of planning control or injury to amenity, ie the ground (f) appeal
- Whether the periods for compliance fall short of what should reasonably be allowed, ie the ground (g) appeal
What decided it
The less than substantial heritage harm to the character and significance of the Headington Quarry Conservation Area was not outweighed by the public benefits put forward.
The considerable weight given to the harm to the conservation area's character and significance outweighed the limited weight attributed to the public benefits (modest housing provision, environmental benefits of retaining the building, and support for a local business), so permission was refused.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DH1Policy DH2Policy DH3Policy H16
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 212Paragraph 215
- Judgments
- Choiceplace Properties Ltd v SSHCLG & LB Barnett [2021] EWHC 1070 (Admin); Barnett v SSCLG [2009] EWCA Civ 476
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Oxford City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Notice upheld13 August 20263349449Land Lying to West of 96 Church Way, Iffley, Oxford, OX4 4EF
- Notice varied and upheld24 April 2026337539640 Bartholomew Road, Oxford, OX4 3QQ
- Quashed On Legal Grounds6 March 20253354100187 Divinity Road, Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX4 1LP
- Allowed8 January 202533445978 Venneit Close, Oxford, OX1 1HZ
- Notice varied and upheld11 December 202433358592 New High Street, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7AQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®