Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 December 20223292432

583 - 585, High Road Leyton, London, E10 6PY

Planning appeal 3292432 at 583 - 585, High Road Leyton, London, E10 6PY (Waltham Forest London Borough Council) was dismissed on 20 December 2022 by Inspector Morgan R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed loss of employment floorspace is justified.

demolition of the timber shop/storages currently located on the site and construction of apartment block that contains 6 units

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Morgan R
Postcode
E10 6PY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed loss of employment floorspace is justified
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether satisfactory living conditions would be provided for future occupiers of units A1 and A2, with particular regard to outlook; privacy; light; ventilation; noise and disturbance
  • whether satisfactory living conditions would be provided for future occupiers of units A2 and A6, with regard to space standards
  • whether the proposal would make appropriate provision for promoting sustainable forms of transport

What decided it

The proposal conflicted with the development plan on multiple grounds—loss of employment land without justification, harm to character and appearance, unacceptable living conditions in ground floor units, inadequate space standards, and failure to secure car-free development—and no other considerations outweighed these findings.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CS8DM20CS15DM29D4CS13DM32DM6DM23DM7T6T6.1CS7DM16
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 57Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

534 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Waltham Forest London Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed28 September 20266011926
    220 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 3AY
  2. Dismissed28 September 20266011324
    L/A to 2 Claremont Road, London, E17 5RJ
  3. Dismissed18 September 20266011375
    Land to R/O 34-40 Hillcrest Road, Walthamstow, E17 4AP
  4. Dismissed30 July 20266008789
    200 202 Billet Road, Walthamstow, E17 5DX
  5. Allowed21 July 20266006927
    8 Mulberry Close, Chingford, London, E4 8BS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.