Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 September 20223292535

1 Prince of Orange Lane, Greenwich , SE10 8JQ

a “proposed change of use from B1 offices to C3 residential use including extension of basement and loft conversion with associated new roof with increased ridge height, new dormer windows and rooflights for 2 No. self contained flats”

Authority
Royal Borough of Greenwich
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Naylor R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • effects of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and the setting of the designated and non-designated heritage assets
  • living conditions of neighbouring occupiers at 193 - 195 Greenwich High Road having particular regard to matters of outlook and enclosure
  • living conditions for future occupiers with specific regard to outdoor amenity space

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area and setting of heritage assets, combined with harm to neighbouring living conditions, could not be justified by the modest public benefits offered, particularly given the availability of a fallback position that would provide comparable housing without these harms.

Framework references: 199, 202

Plan policies cited: London Plan Policy D3, London Plan Policy D6, London Plan Policy HC1, London Plan Policy HC2, Royal Greenwich Local Plan Policy DH1, Royal Greenwich Local Plan Policy DH(b), Royal Greenwich Local Plan Policy DH(h), Royal Greenwich Local Plan Policy DH(i), Royal Greenwich Local Plan Policy DH(j), Royal Greenwich Local Plan Policy H5

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.