Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 September 20223292843

75 High Street, Odiham, Hook, RG29 1LB

Planning appeal 3292843 at 75 High Street, Odiham, Hook, RG29 1LB (Hart District Council) was dismissed on 23 September 2022 by Inspector Tucker A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal upon the significance of the grade II listed building known as 75 High Street, and the character and appearance of the Odiham Conservation Area.

internal alterations and single storey rear extension to create 2 bedroom dwelling. Replacement shop front and replacement glass to ground floor windows on front elevation

Appeal type
other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Tucker A
Postcode
RG29 1LB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal upon the significance of the grade II listed building known as 75 High Street, and the character and appearance of the Odiham Conservation Area
  • Whether the lack of parking provision would be appropriate

What decided it

The significant harm to the special interest of the listed building and character of the conservation area caused by the likely vacancy of the reduced retail unit, which would not be adequately equipped with welfare facilities and would therefore be difficult to let, outweighed the limited public benefits of a single dwelling and shopfront repairs.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy ED6Policy NBE8Policy NBE9Policy INF3Saved Policy GEN1Policy 9 of the Odiham and North Warnborough Neighbourhood Plan 2014-2032
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 199Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

23 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Hart

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed30 July 20263375985
    Park and Ride, Elvetham Heath Way, Fleet, Hampshire, GU51 1HG
  2. Allowed13 February 20266002947
    Highbank, Copse Lane, Long Sutton, Hampshire, RG29 1SX
  3. Allowed27 January 20263372608
    Grey House Mount Pleasant, Hartley Wintney, Hook, RG27 8PW
  4. Allowed18 December 20256000602
    2 Chantreyland, New Road, Eversley, Hampshire, RG27 0PA
  5. Allowed18 December 20256000601
    1 Chantreyland, New Road, Eversley, Hampshire, RG27 0PA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.