Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 December 20223292861

Bramleys, 217 Bramley Road, London, N14 4XA

Planning appeal 3292861 at Bramleys, 217 Bramley Road, London, N14 4XA (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 29 December 2022 by Inspector Symmons J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

change of use from estate agent (A2) to cafe (A3) involving two storey rear extension with basement level to allow for a B1/C3 live/work unit and installation of extractor flue (Retrospective)

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Minor general industry/storage/warehousing
Inspector
Symmons J
Postcode
N14 4XA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers of 215A and 217A Bramley Road regarding outlook and light
  • the living conditions of future and neighbouring occupiers regarding noise

What decided it

The absence of sufficient detail regarding the kitchen extraction system's noise specification meant unacceptable harm to the living conditions of future and neighbouring residential occupiers regarding noise could not be ruled out, combined with the proposal's adverse effect on the character and appearance of the area.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP30Policy CP2Policy CP4Policy CP32Policy DMD8Policy DMD11Policy DMD37Policy DMD29Policy DMD32Policy DMD64Policy DMD65Policy DMD68Policy D1Policy D4Policy D14

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

277 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  2. Allowed28 August 20266008361
    9 The Spinney, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LL
  3. Dismissed6 August 20266006826
    28 The Crest, London, N13 5JT
  4. Dismissed30 June 20266005153
    27 Abbey Road, Enfield, EN1 2QP
  5. Notice varied and upheld4 June 20263336794
    Land on West Side of Burnt Farm Ride, Enfield, EN2 9DY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.