Planning appeal decision
Baldwin House, 290-298 Baldwins Lane, Birmingham, B28 0XB
Planning appeal 3293166 at Baldwin House, 290-298 Baldwins Lane, Birmingham, B28 0XB (Birmingham City Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 3 August 2022 by Inspector Griffin E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development upon the living conditions of the occupants of the flats having particular regard to the provision of private outside amenity space.
Without planning permission, the unauthorised change of use of the rear of the premises to two self-contained flats in the approximate position marked in green on the attached plan
- Authority
- Birmingham City Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Griffin E
- Postcode
- B28 0XB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the development upon the living conditions of the occupants of the flats having particular regard to the provision of private outside amenity space
- the effect of the development upon the living conditions of the occupants of the flats having particular regard to the provision of internal space, outlook and natural light
- the suitability of the development for housing with particular regard to its location and context
What decided it
The significant harm to living conditions arising from inadequate private amenity space, internal space below technical standards, and poor outlook and natural light, combined with the out-of-context backland location, outweighed the modest housing benefits even under the tilted balance.
Although the tilted balance was engaged due to lack of five-year housing land supply, the adverse impacts of harm to living conditions and poor design in an out-of-context location significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest benefits of two additional flats and local economic contributions.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy PG3Policy TP27Policy TP35Policy DM2Policy DM10
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 130
- Judgments
- Somak Travel v SSE & Brent LBC [1987] JPL 630
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Birmingham City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Notice upheld8 September 2026337122137 Church Street, Lozells, Birmingham, B19 1QN
- Notice varied and upheld24 August 20263358730806 Pershore Road, Selly Park, Birmingham, B29 7LS
- Notice varied and upheld20 August 2026337200361 Hagley Road West, Birmingham, B17 8AE
- Notice upheld20 August 20263364185448 Alum Rock Road, Birmingham, B8 3HT
- Notice varied and upheld27 April 202633706392 Cliff Rock Road, Rednal, Birmingham, B45 8QE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®