Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 March 20233293430

Land to the South of Chadwick Lane, Chadwick End, Solihull, B93 0BW

Planning appeal 3293430 at Land to the South of Chadwick Lane, Chadwick End, Solihull, B93 0BW (Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 6 March 2023 by Inspector Aqbal M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

the erection of a new single-detached dwelling on land to the south of Chadwick Lane near Temple Balsall in the Borough of Solihull. The proposed five bedroom dwelling has a GIFA of 7000ft² including integrated garage space

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Aqbal M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • Whether the development site is in a suitable location for housing with regard to accessibility to services, facilities and public transport
  • Whether safe and suitable vehicular access can be provided to the development site
  • Whether the proposal would safeguard protected species and their habitats and deliver a biodiversity net gain
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The substantial and significant harm to Green Belt openness and purposes, combined with the failure to demonstrate safe access, unsuitable location for housing, and unresolved ecological concerns, cannot be clearly outweighed by the modest benefits of the proposal, and very special circumstances do not exist.

The Inspector weighed the modest benefits of housing delivery, employment during construction, support for rural communities, sustainable drainage, and design quality of moderate weight against the substantial harm to Green Belt openness and purposes, the failure to meet accessibility requirements, unresolved highway safety concerns, and undemonstrated biodiversity net gain; the harm was not clearly outweighed by the benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P17Policy P7Policy P8Policy P10
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 79Paragraph 80Paragraph 99Paragraph 105Paragraph 130Paragraph 134Paragraph 137Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

22 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Solihull

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed23 October 20266013961
    The Stables, Barretts Lane Farm, Barretts Lane, Balsall Common, Coventry, CV7 7GB
  2. Allowed23 October 20266009733
    Meadow View, 1A Oldwich Lane West, Chadwick End, B93 0BQ
  3. Allowed12 August 20266010526
    The Woodlands, Lodge Green Lane, Meriden, CV7 7JG
  4. Allowed17 July 20266005246
    Land West of Stratford Road, Hockley Heath, B94 6NU
  5. Dismissed28 May 20266006096
    The Woodlands, Lodge Green Lane, Solihull, CV7 7JG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.