Planning appeal decision
Land to the South of Chadwick Lane, Chadwick End, Solihull, B93 0BW
Planning appeal 3293430 at Land to the South of Chadwick Lane, Chadwick End, Solihull, B93 0BW (Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 6 March 2023 by Inspector Aqbal M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
the erection of a new single-detached dwelling on land to the south of Chadwick Lane near Temple Balsall in the Borough of Solihull. The proposed five bedroom dwelling has a GIFA of 7000ft² including integrated garage space
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Aqbal M
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- Whether the development site is in a suitable location for housing with regard to accessibility to services, facilities and public transport
- Whether safe and suitable vehicular access can be provided to the development site
- Whether the proposal would safeguard protected species and their habitats and deliver a biodiversity net gain
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial and significant harm to Green Belt openness and purposes, combined with the failure to demonstrate safe access, unsuitable location for housing, and unresolved ecological concerns, cannot be clearly outweighed by the modest benefits of the proposal, and very special circumstances do not exist.
The Inspector weighed the modest benefits of housing delivery, employment during construction, support for rural communities, sustainable drainage, and design quality of moderate weight against the substantial harm to Green Belt openness and purposes, the failure to meet accessibility requirements, unresolved highway safety concerns, and undemonstrated biodiversity net gain; the harm was not clearly outweighed by the benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy P17Policy P7Policy P8Policy P10
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 79Paragraph 80Paragraph 99Paragraph 105Paragraph 130Paragraph 134Paragraph 137Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Solihull
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed23 October 20266013961The Stables, Barretts Lane Farm, Barretts Lane, Balsall Common, Coventry, CV7 7GB
- Allowed23 October 20266009733Meadow View, 1A Oldwich Lane West, Chadwick End, B93 0BQ
- Allowed12 August 20266010526The Woodlands, Lodge Green Lane, Meriden, CV7 7JG
- Allowed17 July 20266005246Land West of Stratford Road, Hockley Heath, B94 6NU
- Dismissed28 May 20266006096The Woodlands, Lodge Green Lane, Solihull, CV7 7JG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®