Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 November 20223293776

74 Aubert Park, Islington, London, N5 1TS

Planning appeal 3293776 at 74 Aubert Park, Islington, London, N5 1TS (London Borough of Islington) was dismissed on 22 November 2022 by Inspector O'Doherty A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of each proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and the street scene, with particular regard to the effect on the locally listed shopfront.

excavation of existing basement and creation of lightwells to the front and rear of the property in association with the enlargement of the existing flat from a 1 bedroom single level flat at ground floor level to a 2 bedroom duplex flat set out over basement and ground floor levels. The proposed front lightwell would be covered by a parallel bar metal grille

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
O'Doherty A
Postcode
N5 1TS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of each proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and the street scene, with particular regard to the effect on the locally listed shopfront

What decided it

The proposals would each have an unacceptable and harmful effect on the character and appearance of the host property and street scene, particularly regarding the effect on the locally listed shopfront as a non-designated heritage asset, which cannot be mitigated by the proposed conditions.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CS8CS9DM2.1HC1DM4.8D4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 203

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 790 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Islington

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed22 October 20266006605
    131 - 132 Upper Street, London, N1 1QP
  2. Allowed16 October 20266005930
    30 Sekforde Street, London, EC1R 0HH
  3. Allowed24 September 20266005904
    Upper Flat, 23 Ronalds Road, London, N5 1XF
  4. Dismissed24 September 20266005590
    2 Highbury Grove Court, Highbury Grove, London, N5 2NG
  5. Notice upheld23 September 20263364241
    First and Second Floors, 72 Prebend Street, Islington, London, N1 8PR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.