Planning appeal decision
Land off Coombe Road, Norbiton, Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames, KT2 7QB
Planning appeal 3293957 at Land off Coombe Road, Norbiton, Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames, KT2 7QB (Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames) was allowed on 2 November 2022 by Inspector Stone K, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including the effect on heritage assets.
The redevelopment of land off Coombe Road, Norbiton including the demolition of existing buildings to provide Extra Care Accommodation. This comprises of 128 apartments with associated care and communal facilities, including a Wellness Centre and restaurant
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Stone K
- Postcode
- KT2 7QB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including the effect on heritage assets
- The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupants of neighbouring properties with regard to privacy and outlook/overbearing effect
- Whether the proposed development would make adequate provision for future connection to a district heat network, zero-carbon, a mechanism to address on-street car-parking pressure, sustainable modes of transport, highway junction improvements, affordable housing (subject to early and late stage review), and secure the use of the development as specialist older persons' accommodation and provide sufficient off-site short-stay cycle parking
What decided it
The substantial benefits of delivering 128 housing units, including specialist older persons' accommodation, on a brownfield site outweighed the limited identified harms, leading to a finding of overall accordance with the development plan.
The substantial benefits of housing and specialist elderly accommodation delivery and brownfield reuse, together with moderate economic and community benefits, outweighed the limited harm to non-designated heritage assets and limited conflict with Tall Building policies, with the proposal found to accord with the development plan as a whole (and, in the alternative, to pass the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d)(ii)).
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CS8DM10DM11DM12D3D9DM13DM15H1H4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 120Paragraph 130Paragraph 133
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed7 October 2026601191211 Kingsdowne Road, Surbiton, KT6 6JZ
- Dismissed29 September 2026600998856 Burlington Road, New Malden, KT3 4NU
- Dismissed25 September 2026600907674 - 76 Coombe Road, New Malden, KT3 4QU
- Allowed11 August 20266010924271 Malden Road, New Malden, KT3 6AH
- Dismissed10 August 2026600860012 Coombe Ridings, Kingston Upon Thames, KT2 7JT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®