Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 July 20223294116

2 Byron Mews, London, NW3 2NQ

Planning appeal 3294116 at 2 Byron Mews, London, NW3 2NQ (London Borough of Camden) was dismissed on 29 July 2022 by Inspector Simpson L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the surrounding area, with particular regard to the effect on the Mansfield Conservation Area.

described on the planning application form as: ‘A new side infill extension to an existing mews house. The extension is single storey across the depth of the house with an additional second storey at the rear set back from the front elevation by a third of the depth of the house.’

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Simpson L
Postcode
NW3 2NQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the surrounding area, with particular regard to the effect on the Mansfield Conservation Area

What decided it

The modest public benefits of the proposed development would not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the heritage asset (the Mansfield Conservation Area) caused by the loss of symmetry and obscuring of views to the historic tram shed wall.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Camden Local Plan (2017) Policy D1Camden Local Plan (2017) Policy D2Hampstead Neighbourhood Plan 2018-2033 Policy DH1Hampstead Neighbourhood Plan 2018-2033 Policy DH2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 199Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

540 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Camden

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed13 October 20266013300
    166 Grafton Road, London, NW5 4BA
  2. Allowed12 October 20266007435
    Footpath Adjacent, 2 Castlehaven Road, London, NW1 8QU
  3. Allowed12 October 20266007433
    Footpath Adjacent, 2 Castlehaven Road, London, NW1 8QU
  4. Allowed12 October 20266007308
    Camden Road, Outside No.'s 84 - 92, London, NW1 9DY
  5. Allowed12 October 20266007299
    Camden Road, Outside No.'s 84 - 92, London, NW1 9DY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.