Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 January 20233294292

18 Kingswood Creek, Wraysbury, STAINES-UPON-THAMES, TW19 5EN

retrospective alterations to roof space and construction of 2x front facing dormers, 1 front facing velux, and 3 rear facing dormers to provide additional habitable space and front open porch

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Shearing C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt by reason of disproportionate additions to the original building, and the resulting harm to openness and Green Belt purposes is not clearly outweighed by other considerations.

Framework references: 137, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy QP5

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.