Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed12 August 20223294338

Land Adjoining 206 High Street, Wouldham, Rochester, Kent

Planning appeal 3294338 at Land Adjoining 206 High Street, Wouldham, Rochester, Kent (Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council) was allowed on 12 August 2022 by Inspector Martinson P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

‘erection of 1 No. 2-bedroom dwelling with associated access, landscaping and parking’

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Martinson P
Postcode
ME1 3UD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The absence of a five-year housing supply triggered the presumption in favour of sustainable development, and the limited nature of the identified harm to character and appearance could not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of housing delivery in a location where additional housing is generally to be encouraged.

The limited harm to character and appearance from loss of open space was outweighed by the small contribution to housing supply and minor economic benefits, with the presumption in favour of sustainable development applying due to the lack of a five-year housing supply

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP24 of the Tonbridge and Malling Core Strategy (2007)Policy SQ1 of the Tonbridge and Malling Managing Development and the Environment DPD (2010)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

11 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tonbridge and Malling

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed8 June 20266004257
    26 The Maltings, Carpenters Lane, Hadlow, Tonbridge, TN11 0DQ
  2. Allowed5 December 20253373454
    The Woodman, Sweets Lane, East Malling, Kent, ME19 6JF
  3. Allowed11 August 20253364087
    111 Douglas Road, Tonbridge, TN9 2UD
  4. Allowed22 July 20253361029
    Parkview, 113 High Street, Tonbridge, TN9 1DL
  5. Dismissed12 May 20253360419
    2 Trevithick Drive, Wouldham, Rochester, Kent, ME1 3TZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.