Planning appeal decision
Chris Stevens Ltd, 204 Colney Hatch Lane, London, N10 1ET
Planning appeal 3294348 at Chris Stevens Ltd, 204 Colney Hatch Lane, London, N10 1ET (London Borough of Barnet) was dismissed on 5 October 2022 by Inspector Plenty B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the surrounding area and the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers in terms of outlook, and if any harm caused, would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited in the location proposed having regard to the potential availability of alternative sites.
the installation of 1No. 17.5m high monopole supporting 6no. antennas, the installation of 2no. cabinets and 1no. meter cabinet and ancillary works thereto
- Authority
- London Borough of Barnet
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Plenty B
- Postcode
- N10 1ET
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the surrounding area and the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers in terms of outlook, and if any harm caused, would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited in the location proposed having regard to the potential availability of alternative sites
What decided it
The substantial and unmitigated harm to character and appearance and neighbouring occupiers' outlook, combined with the failure to demonstrate that no suitable alternative sites exist in less visually sensitive locations, outweighed the benefits of improved digital connectivity.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- DM01DM18
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Barnet
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed14 April 20266001389Barnet Burnt Oak Leisure Centre, Watling Avenue, Edgeware, HA8 0NP
- Allowed17 March 20266000469Springwell Centre, Barnet Hospital, London, EN5 3DJ
- Allowed18 February 20266001161Grass Verge on Langford Road, Barnet, London, EN4 9TY
- Dismissed14 January 20266001204Outside 780-782, Finchley Road, London, NW11 7TH
- Allowed16 December 20253361106Grass Verge Between Grahame Park Way and Avion Crescent, Colindale, London, NW9 5QY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®