Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld28 July 20223294478

Land at 31 Leafield Drive, Wakefield, WF2 0FT

Planning appeal 3294478 at Land at 31 Leafield Drive, Wakefield, WF2 0FT (Wakefield Metropolitan District Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 28 July 2022 by Inspector Thompson F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the fence on the character and appearance of the area.

without planning permission, the erection of a boundary fence more than 1.0m in height adjacent to highway on the Land

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Thompson F
Postcode
WF2 0FT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the fence on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the requirements of the enforcement notice exceed what is necessary

What decided it

The fence's prominent position adjacent to the highway and its height, length and materials create an unacceptably enclosing and incongruous feature that appreciably harms the character and appearance of the area, but the enforcement notice was varied to allow reduction to 1m height as a realistic fallback position reflecting permitted development rights.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS10 of the Wakefield Metropolitan District Council Local Development Framework Core Strategy 2009Policy D9 of the Wakefield Development Policies Local Development Framework 2009Policy D10 of the Wakefield Development Policies Local Development Framework 2009

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

23 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wakefield Metropolitan District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Notice varied and upheld1 September 20263371510
    25 Milton Street, Wakefield, WF2 8TL
  2. Notice varied and upheld24 August 20263361281
    Wragby Grange, Doncaster Road, Wragby, Wakefield, West Yorkshire, WF4 1QX
  3. Notice varied and upheld6 August 20263363754
    Land at Greenfield Road, Normanton, WF6 2JD
  4. Notice upheld24 July 20263375942
    Land at Unit 8 Back Grantley Street, Wakefield, WF1 4LG
  5. Notice varied and upheld24 July 20263374765
    4 Brooksfield, South Kirkby, Pontefract, WF9 3DL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.