Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 March 20233294509

33 Forest Side, WORCESTER PARK, KT4 7PA

described as: Changes to the existing roof tile, from red/brown to grey (Redland Plain Tile – Slate Grey). This includes the tiles to the main roof and dormer, rear ground floor extension roof, front porch roof & hanging tiles to portion of wall between the bay windows on the front elevation

Authority
Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Perkins L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the Council's decision to refuse the application for a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded

What decided it

The change in roof tile colour breached Conditions 1 and 3 of the 2020 planning permission and Article 3(4) of the General Permitted Development Order, which prevents development contrary to planning conditions, meaning the works were not lawful.

Plan policies cited: Policy DM10

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.