Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 February 20233294824

Land Between The Croft And Hopwood Garden Centre, Ash Lane, Alvechurch, Worcestershire, B48 7TT

construction of No. 15 affordable (Discounted Market Sales Housing) dwellings including No. 3 retirement bungalows with associated provision for car parking, open space, landscaping and infrastructure works

Authority
Bromsgrove District Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Williamson J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to relevant development plan policies and the Framework
  • if the proposed development is inappropriate development, its effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether the proposed development causes any other harm, with particular regard to: a) highway safety, and b) whether future occupiers would have suitable access to services and facilities to meet their day-to-day needs, employment opportunities and public transport links
  • if the proposed development is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations that amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The substantial weight attached to the Green Belt harm (inappropriateness, significant loss of openness and encroachment) was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations, so very special circumstances did not exist.

the significant harm to Green Belt openness and encroachment, together with the inherent harm of inappropriateness, to which substantial weight was given, was not clearly outweighed by the benefits of housing and affordable housing delivery, POS, economic benefits and biodiversity enhancement, so very special circumstances did not exist

Framework references: 2, 11, 47, 57, 79, 104, 105, 110, 112, 137, 138, 147, 148, 149

Plan policies cited: BDP2, BDP4, BD4, BDP16, BDP1, H2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.