Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 September 20223294839

Birchfield. Broad Marston Lane, Mickleton, Chipping Campden, GL55 6SF

Planning appeal 3294839 at Birchfield. Broad Marston Lane, Mickleton, Chipping Campden, GL55 6SF (Cotswold District Council) was dismissed on 6 September 2022 by Inspector Rogers J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the location of the proposed development is appropriate, having regard to local planning policies on the location of housing.

the demolition of the existing dwelling and development of 2 new dwellings and associated parking

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Rogers J
Postcode
GL55 6SF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the location of the proposed development is appropriate, having regard to local planning policies on the location of housing

What decided it

The proposed development conflicts with the development plan strategy for housing location and there are no material considerations that would justify a decision other than in accordance with the development plan.

The small social and economic benefits of a single dwelling did not outweigh the conflict with the development plan

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DS1Policy DS3Policy DS4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 12Paragraph 60Paragraph 61
Judgments
Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd and Richborough Estates Partnership LLP v Cheshire East Borough Council [2017] UKSC 37

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

8 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Cotswold

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266010613
    Land Rear of 88 Chesterton Lane, Cirencester, GL7 1YD
  2. Allowed13 October 20266007597
    Kilkeney Inn, Andoversford, Cheltenham, GL54 4LN
  3. Dismissed6 October 20266010770
    100 Gloucester Road, Cirencester, GL7 2LW
  4. Allowed30 September 20266009635
    Stratton House Hotel, Gloucester Road, Stratton, GL7 2LE
  5. Dismissed30 September 20266009631
    Stratton House Hotel, Gloucester Road, Stratton, GL7 2LE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.