Planning appeal decision
Georgina Court, 316 Beulah Hill, Upper Norwood, London, SE19 3HF
described in the application form as “a two-storey upwards extension over the main roof of the existing building to provide 6 new flats…
- Authority
- London Borough of Croydon
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Cowley R
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether prior approval should be granted having particular regard to the effects of the proposal on the external appearance of the building
- Whether prior approval should be granted having particular regard to the transport and highways impacts of the development
What decided it
The proposal would cause undue harm to the external appearance of the building and result in unacceptable transport and highways impacts through parking overspill and inadequate cycle parking provision.
Framework references: 111
Plan policies cited: Policy SP4, Policy DM10, Policy DM30, Policy D3, Policy T5, Policy T6.1
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®