Planning appeal decision
Plot 07, Sunset Park Homes, Whitfield, BRACKLEY, NN13 5TD
Retention of 4no. Static Caravans
- Authority
- Buckinghamshire Council - Aylesbury Area *
- Appeal type
- other · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Unknown
- Inspector
- Coffey L
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed increase in the number of caravans, including any cumulative effects, is acceptable having regard to the location of the site within the countryside and the proximity to services and facilities in the surrounding area.
- The effect of the proposals, including any cumulative effects, on the character and appearance of the surrounding countryside.
- Whether the proposed site would provide suitable living conditions for future occupants with particular regard to amenity space and privacy.
- Whether in the absence of any provision for touring caravans the proposed site would be suitable for Gypsies and Travellers.
- The need for and supply of Gypsy and Traveller sites within Buckinghamshire, including whether there is a five year supply of Gypsy and Traveller sites.
- The availability of alternative sites;
- The accommodation needs and personal circumstances of the appellants.
- The Gypsy and Traveller status of the occupants of the site.
What decided it
The Inspector's finding that the proposals, taken in the round, complied with the development plan as a whole (with only limited, localised harm and an unmet, underestimated need for Gypsy and Traveller pitches), meaning permission should be granted in accordance with paragraph 11 of the Framework.
The environmental, social and economic sustainability of the proposals and the pressing and urgent need for pitches outweighed the limited harm to countryside character from Plots 1, 1A and 2 and the limited weight attached to the intentional unauthorised development, such that the proposals accorded with the development plan as a whole.
Framework references: 11
Plan policies cited: Policy S6, Policy D11, Policy S2, Policy S3, Policy NE4, Policy S7, Policy S1
Judgments cited: Lisa Smith -v- The Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and Others [2021] EWHC 1650 (Admin)
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®