Planning appeal decision
Astley House, Spital Road, Lewes, BN7 1PW
Planning appeal 3295783 at Astley House, Spital Road, Lewes, BN7 1PW (South Downs) was dismissed on 3 October 2022 by Inspector Kirby R, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of the Lewes Conservation Area (CA).
demolition of the vacant building and the construction of 28 residential units with associated landscaping and on-site car parking
- Authority
- South Downs
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Kirby R
- Postcode
- BN7 1PW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of the Lewes Conservation Area (CA)
- the effect on the living conditions of nearby occupiers with regard to car parking provision and the design of the proposed development, and the intended future occupiers in respect of internal space standards and external amenity space
- whether or not the mix of housing proposed reflects local need
- whether the absence of affordable housing is consistent with the development plan
- the effect on highway safety including pedestrians, with particular regard to off street parking provision, space within the site for vehicles to manoeuvre and access arrangements
- whether or not the residential units could be sustainably constructed
- whether or not the site could be suitably drained
- whether the contributions sought in respect of a Travel Plan Statement Audit Fee and a Traffic Regulation Order in respect of re-locating on-street parking bays are reasonable and necessary to make the development acceptable
What decided it
The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area and to the setting of the Lewes Conservation Area (and, in Appeal A, a non-designated heritage asset) was not outweighed by the public benefits of the schemes.
the considerable benefits of the proposals (housing delivery, brownfield redevelopment, pedestrian and public realm improvements) were not sufficient, individually or cumulatively, to outweigh the harm to the character and appearance of the area, to heritage assets, and to living conditions, and the conflict with the development plan as a whole
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SD4Policy SD5Policy SD12Policy SD15Policy SD25Policy PL1 BPolicy PL2Policy HC3 APolicy SD27Policy PL1 APolicy SD28Policy AM1Policy SD19Policy SD20Policy SD21Policy SD22Policy AM3Policy SD48Policy PL4Policy SD17Policy SD50
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 200Paragraph 202Paragraph 58Paragraph 57
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Downs
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed28 May 20266004671Reeves Britannia, 140 The Causeway, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU31 4LL
- Notice varied and upheld23 April 20263371500Land at Quin Hay Fram, Petersfield Road, Froxfield, Petersfield , GU32 1BZ
- Dismissed27 February 20266001142Flying Bull, London Road, Rake, Rogate, GU33 7JB
- Notice upheld9 February 20263346595Moodys Meadow, Petersfield Road, Bramdean, Hampshire, SO24 0JX
- Allowed18 December 20256000723The Sanctuary, Manor Farm Green, Twyford, Hampshire, SO21 1RA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®