Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 October 20223295986

Queen Alexandra Road, High Wycombe, HP11 1BG

Planning appeal 3295986 at Queen Alexandra Road, High Wycombe, HP11 1BG (Buckinghamshire Council - Wycombe Area *) was dismissed on 7 October 2022 by Inspector Page L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and designated heritage assets, and whether any harm would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed considering any suitable alternatives and public benefits.

18.0m Phase 8 Monopole C/W wrapround Cabinet at base and associated ancillary works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Page L
Postcode
HP11 1BG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and designated heritage assets, and whether any harm would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed considering any suitable alternatives and public benefits

What decided it

The prominence of the monopole in the skyline and its erosion of the leafy and green character and appearance of the area and the setting and significance of designated heritage assets outweighs the public benefits of improved telecommunications connectivity.

What the Inspector cited

National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 199Paragraph 202Paragraph 114

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

153 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Buckinghamshire Council - Wycombe Area

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed11 March 20243322930
    Area of Grass Verge, Thame Road, (Lpa = Opp GreenSpace, Chestnut Way), Longwick, Buckinghamshire, H P27 9SG
  2. Dismissed8 November 20233309595
    Area of Grass Verge, Plomer Green Lane, Downley, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, HP13 5LR
  3. Dismissed20 June 20233306826
    Area of Grass Verge, Hamilton Road, Hughenden Valley, High Wycombe Buckinghamshire, HP13 5FE
  4. Dismissed28 February 20233302918
    Holmers Farm Way, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, HP12 4TS
  5. Dismissed8 December 20223300263
    Daws Hill Lane, Daws Hill, High Wycombe, HP11 1PU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.