Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 October 20223296279

232, Medlock Road, Failsworth, M35 9NG

Planning appeal 3296279 at 232, Medlock Road, Failsworth, M35 9NG (Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 5 October 2022 by Inspector Morgan R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and development plan policy, including the effect on openness.

A stable block comprising 13 loose boxes in two rows with central corridor access, sited to the rear of the exercise arena on land currently used for grazing

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
agricultural · Other Major Developments
Inspector
Morgan R
Postcode
M35 9NG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and development plan policy, including the effect on openness
  • if the development would be inappropriate, whether the harm to the Green Belt would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The proposal would fail to preserve the openness of the Green Belt in both visual and spatial terms, constituting inappropriate development for which no very special circumstances existed to justify approval.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Core Strategy Policy 22
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 137Paragraph 147Paragraph 149

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

40 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed10 August 20266009617
    The Stables, 67 Thornham Road, Shaw, OL2 7HR
  2. Dismissed28 April 20263359774
    Land to the Southern Side of Cragg Road, Chadderton, Oldham, OL1 2RX
  3. Dismissed20 April 20263375124
    Clough Manor Hotel, Rochdale Road, Denshaw, Oldham, OL3 5UE
  4. Dismissed9 March 20263376260
    The Barn Diglea, Diggle, Oldham, OL3 5LA
  5. Allowed21 October 20253367017
    Land on the South Side of Medlock Road, Failsworth, Manchester, M35 9WG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.