Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 November 20223296386

Charles Street (Nos 39-43) & Norfolk Street (Nos 186-194), Sheffield, S1 2JH

Planning appeal 3296386 at Charles Street (Nos 39-43) & Norfolk Street (Nos 186-194), Sheffield, S1 2JH (Sheffield City Council) was dismissed on 21 November 2022 by Inspector Clowes M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development upon the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers at Berona House, St Paul's Chambers and the Prudential Assurance Building with particular regard to levels of daylight and sunlight, and the effect on outlook.

demolition of existing buildings in a conservation area and the construction of a 10-storey Grade A office building (Class E) including basement with ground floor flexible retail and/or other Class E uses

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Major offices/R&D/light industry
Inspector
Clowes M
Postcode
S1 2JH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development upon the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers at Berona House, St Paul's Chambers and the Prudential Assurance Building with particular regard to levels of daylight and sunlight, and the effect on outlook
  • Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the City Centre Conservation Area, having particular regard to the effect on the significance of non-designated heritage assets at Berona House and St Paul's Chambers and the effect on the setting of the Grade II listed Prudential Assurance Building

What decided it

The considerable importance and weight attaching to the harm caused to the character and appearance of the conservation area and the significance of non-designated heritage assets outweighed the limited public benefits of the scheme.

The heritage harm to the conservation area and non-designated heritage assets, to which considerable importance and weight attached, outweighed the public benefits of Grade A office space provision, carbon neutral design and job creation, to which limited weight was attributed.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy S10 of the Sheffield Unitary Development Plan 1998Policy BE5 of the Sheffield Unitary Development Plan 1998Policy BE15 of the Sheffield Unitary Development Plan 1998Policy BE16 of the Sheffield Unitary Development Plan 1998Policy CS74 of the Sheffield Development Framework Core Strategy (2009)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 119Paragraph 124Paragraph 130Paragraph 197Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

196 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Sheffield City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266014327
    4 Struan Road, Sheffield, S7 2EH
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266009090
    Meadow Farm, Whiteley Wood Road, Sheffield, S11 7TJ
  3. Dismissed20 October 20266014347
    Advertising Right Adjacent Park House, Bernard Road, Sheffield, S2 5BQ
  4. Allowed16 October 20266014719
    1 Twickenham Court, Halfway, Sheffield, S20 4HT
  5. Allowed12 October 20266012829
    189 Crimicar Lane, Sheffield, S10 4EH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.