Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 December 20223296388

Arethusa Way, Guildford Road, Bisley, GU24 9DD

Planning appeal 3296388 at Arethusa Way, Guildford Road, Bisley, GU24 9DD (Surrey Heath Borough Council) was dismissed on 9 December 2022 by Inspector Sutton A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area.

a 15.0m Phase 8 Monopole C/W wrapround Cabinet at base and associated ancillary works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Sutton A
Postcode
GU24 9DD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the living conditions of the occupants of 2 Arethusa Way, with regard to outlook
  • the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the safety of road users at the junction of Arethusa Way/Guildford Road, with regard to visibility splays
  • if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed, taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The substantial harm to character and appearance and living conditions, combined with insufficient evidence that no more suitable alternatives were reasonably available, outweighed the limited benefits of the telecommunications infrastructure.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM9Policy DM11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

82 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Surrey Heath Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed15 July 20253361975
    Footpath Outside 71 High Street, Camberley, GU15 3RB
  2. Dismissed14 July 20253361972
    Footpath Outside 12-18 High Street, Camberley, Surrey, GU15 3SX
  3. Dismissed7 March 20233300277
    Brentmoor Road, Donkey Town, West End, GU24 9PR
  4. Dismissed9 August 20223285903
    Chobham Road, Chobham, Surrey, GU24 8AR
  5. Dismissed5 May 20223282698
    Mytchett Road , Mytchett, Surrey , GU16 6DF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.