Planning appeal decision
Oakwood, Newpasture Lane, Sailing Road, Stebbing, CM6 3TD
Planning appeal 3296487 at Oakwood, Newpasture Lane, Sailing Road, Stebbing, CM6 3TD (Uttlesford District Council) was dismissed on 9 March 2023 by Inspector Szymanski D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area.
erection of 1No. dwelling
- Authority
- Uttlesford District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Szymanski D
- Postcode
- CM6 3TD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal upon the setting and significance of Grade II Listed Buildings
- whether or not the proposal would be in a suitable location having regard to policies for the location of new dwellings
- whether or not the proposal would be in a suitable location having regard to the accessibility of services and facilities
What decided it
The harm to the setting and significance of the Grade II Listed Buildings, when given considerable importance and weight as required by the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and paragraph 202 of the Framework, significantly outweighs the limited public benefits of the proposal.
The harm to heritage assets and character and appearance, together with conflicts with development plan policies for location of new dwellings and accessibility to services, significantly outweighed the limited public benefits including small economic benefit, housing contribution, and rural community support.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S7Policy H1Policy GEN2Policy ENV2Policy STEB1Policy STEB5Policy STEB9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 8Paragraph 11Paragraph 14Paragraph 79Paragraph 80Paragraph 105Paragraph 130Paragraph 174Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 202
- Judgments
- Braintree DC v SSCLG [2018] EWCA Civ. 610
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Uttlesford District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed26 October 202660102676 Coopers Villas, Coopers End Road, Takeley, CM22 6PT
- Dismissed22 October 20266011359Equestrian Site, Birchanger Road, Birchanger, Bishop's Stortford, CM23 5QH
- Dismissed13 October 20266009731Land North of Tile House Bungalow, Stebbing Green, Dumow, CM6 3TE
- Allowed6 October 20266006335Two Sticks, High Easter Road, High Easter, CM1 4PZ
- Dismissed1 October 20266010951Land North of the Bower House, Clatterbury Lane, Clavering, CB11 4QR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®