Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 October 20223297123

24 Sandy Lane, MACCLESFIELD, CHESHIRE, SK10 4RJ

an extension remodel of an existing 2-storey bungalow

Authority
Cheshire East
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Ellis D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development for the purposes of development plan policy and the National Planning Policy Framework, including the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the dwellinghouse, its wider setting and the countryside with particular regards to its prominence
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • if the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The proposal would result in a disproportionate 73% increase in volume substantially exceeding the 30% policy threshold, with prominent design features that would harm the character and appearance of the Green Belt and countryside, and no other considerations clearly outweighed this harm.

Framework references: 149

Plan policies cited: Policy PG3, Policy GC1, Policy GC12, Policy SD2, Policy SE1, Policy DC2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.