Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 December 20223297614

128 Carr Avenue, Leiston, IP16 4AT

Planning appeal 3297614 at 128 Carr Avenue, Leiston, IP16 4AT (East Suffolk) was dismissed on 13 December 2022 by Inspector Bell-Williamson J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed erection of the fence on the character and appearance of the street scene, including the effect on use of the adjacent public footpath.

I would like to move the boundary fence to the border of what is on the deeds of the property. The fence is currently running to the rear of the property which is adjacent to private car parking spaces with vehicular access for residents, this will not be moved any closer to the driveway or cause any obstruction to vehicles manoeuvring in or out of spaces. The fence then runs down to the side of the property to where it meets the house, this would be moved out to run along the pathway and extended to the front of the property. The fence will not be moved any closer to the area with vehicular access, only closer to the pathway and then extended to the front of the property. All of this will be done within the boundary deeds as per the HM Land registry document included when buying the house

Authority
East Suffolk
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Bell-Williamson J
Postcode
IP16 4AT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed erection of the fence on the character and appearance of the street scene, including the effect on use of the adjacent public footpath

What decided it

The loss of the green area softening effect and narrowing of the public footpath would harmfully undermine the planned character and appearance of the residential estate.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
SCLP11.1SCLP11.2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

13 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in East Suffolk

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266002993
    17 Market Place, Southwold, IP18 6EB
  2. Dismissed29 October 20266002990
    17 Market Place, Southwold, IP18 6EB
  3. Dismissed27 October 20266009600
    Part Land Rear Of Grove Cottage, The Street, Little Bealings, IP13 6LT
  4. Dismissed27 October 20266003858
    27 Sun Lane, Woodbridge, IP12 1EG
  5. Dismissed27 October 20266003855
    27 Sun Lane, Woodbridge, IP12 1EG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.