Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 November 20223297727

129 High Road, South Woodford, London, E18 2PA

Planning appeal 3297727 at 129 High Road, South Woodford, London, E18 2PA (London Borough of Redbridge) was dismissed on 30 November 2022 by Inspector Bayliss G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character or appearance of the Conservation Area and on the setting of nearby Listed Buildings.

the erection of 1no. new residential unit with commercial floorspace at ground floor at the rear of 129 and 129a High Road

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Bayliss G
Postcode
E18 2PA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character or appearance of the Conservation Area and on the setting of nearby Listed Buildings

What decided it

The excessive height, form and appearance of the proposed building would cause less-than-substantial harm to the Conservation Area and the setting of nearby Listed Buildings, and this harm is not outweighed by the limited public benefits of delivering a single dwelling and commercial space.

The less-than-substantial harm to designated heritage assets, to which great weight must be given, outweighs the limited benefits of housing delivery and economic activity in a location where the Council cannot meet its housing targets

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
LP26LP33
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

349 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Redbridge

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Quashed On Legal Grounds29 September 20263372674
    Land at 112 Highbury Gardens , Seven King , Ilford , IG3 8AA
  2. Allowed25 September 20266013032
    289 Roding Lane North, Woodford Green, Essex, IG8 8LH
  3. Dismissed25 September 20263361999
    2A Hall Road, Chadwell Heath, Romford, RM6 4LH
  4. Allowed25 September 20263360229
    38, Hertford Road, Newbury Park, Ilford, IG2 7HF
  5. Notice varied and upheld23 September 20263369444
    12 Westrow Gardens, Ilford, IG3 9NE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.