Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 April 20233297966

8 Boundary Lane, London, SE17 2BH

Planning appeal 3297966 at 8 Boundary Lane, London, SE17 2BH (London Borough of Southwark) was dismissed on 24 April 2023 by Inspector O'Brien L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area; including whether or not the development would preserve or enhance the Walworth Road Conservation Area and its setting.

Loft conversion to terrace house currently used as HMO for up to 9 people (sui generis), with creation of rear dormer preserving the front slope of the roof, to accommodate 2 extra bedrooms and communal spaces, for a total of up to 11 people. Addition of 2 conservation rooflights to the front and 4 skylights to the rear. Internal alterations

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
O'Brien L
Postcode
SE17 2BH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area; including whether or not the development would preserve or enhance the Walworth Road Conservation Area and its setting.

What decided it

The proposal would cause less than substantial harm to the heritage asset (Walworth Road Conservation Area) which, when balanced against the limited public benefits of the scheme, resulted in the public benefits not outweighing the harm identified.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P14 of the Southwark Council Southwark Plan 2019 – 2036 (2022)Southwark Council 2015 Technical Update to the Residential Design Standards (2011) Supplementary Planning Document

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

506 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Southwark

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Allowed20 October 20266010489
    269-275 Rye Lane and 1A Philip Walk, London, SE15 4UA
  2. Dismissed30 September 20266001859
    5 More London Place, London, SE1 2BY
  3. Dismissed29 September 20266003226
    Flat 4, 99 Kennington Park Road, London, SE11 4JJ
  4. Dismissed16 September 20266012237
    123 Benhill Road, London, SE5 7LZ
  5. Dismissed17 August 20266007608
    134 Tappesfield Road, London, SE15 3EZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.