Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 February 20233298393

Area of existing grass verge (adopted highway), off Twin Tumps Way, Greenwich, SE28 8RB

a 5G telecoms installation: 15m high ‘slim line’ Phase 8 H3G street pole c/w wrap around cabinet and 3no. cabinets with ancillary works – to be coloured grey

Authority
Royal Borough of Greenwich
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Parkin A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area and, if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed, taking into account any suitable alternative locations

What decided it

The siting and appearance of the proposed mast would cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area, and the appellant failed to demonstrate through a robust sequential assessment that the installation must be sited at this location rather than at suitable alternative sites.

Framework references: 10, 12

Plan policies cited: Policy D3, Policy D8, Policy DH1, Policy DH(c)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.