Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 August 20223298401

Land off Holyport Street, Holyport, Bray, near Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 2JR

the erection of a pair of semi-detached dwellinghouses and associated parking and landscaping

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Szymanski D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (2021) (the Framework) and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposed development upon the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area including the Holyport Conservation Area
  • the effect of the proposed development upon the setting of heritage assets
  • the effect of the proposed development upon biodiversity
  • if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The moderate benefits of the scheme did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to Green Belt openness together with the harm to the character, appearance and heritage significance of the area, so very special circumstances were not established.

the moderate weight attributable to the benefits (housing contribution, biodiversity net gain, economic activity, possible highway benefit) did not clearly outweigh the harm to Green Belt openness and the less than substantial harm to the Holyport Conservation Area and NDHAs, so very special circumstances were not made out and the appeal was dismissed

Framework references: 57, 130, 137, 138, 147, 148, 149, 150, 174, 180, 199, 200, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy QP5, Policy HE1, Policy QP1, Policy QP3, Policy NR3, Policy NR2, Policy SP2

Judgments cited: R (Tate) v Northumberland County Council [2018] EWCA Civ 1519; Julian Wood v SSCLG and Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.