®Planning appeal decision
110 Woolacombe Road, LONDON, SE3 8QL
described on the application form as “the erection of a single-storey rear extension with dimensions of 6m (length), 3m (total maximum height) and 3m with roof light and bi-folding doors
- Authority
- Royal Borough of Greenwich
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Cross D
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would comply with Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the GPDO with regard to whether the proposal would extend beyond a wall forming a side elevation of the original dwellinghouse
- Whether sufficient information has been provided to enable the local planning authority to establish whether the proposal meets the conditions, limitations or restrictions applicable to development permitted by Class A
What decided it
The proposal extends beyond a wall forming a side elevation of the original dwellinghouse with a width greater than half the width of the original dwellinghouse, and the written description contains an inconsistency regarding maximum height that prevents the local planning authority from establishing compliance with Class A conditions.
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.