Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 November 20223298873

96 Longford Road West, North Reddish, Stockport, SK5 6HY

Planning appeal 3298873 at 96 Longford Road West, North Reddish, Stockport, SK5 6HY (Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 18 November 2022 by Inspector Brook S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether this would be a suitable location for the proposal, having regard to encouraging healthy food choices.

The premises are currently used as a Hair Salon. The change of use is to create a fast-food takeaway

Authority
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Change of use
Inspector
Brook S
Postcode
SK5 6HY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether this would be a suitable location for the proposal, having regard to encouraging healthy food choices
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of occupiers of nearby residential development, with specific regard to noise and disturbance

What decided it

The proposal fails to comply with the locational requirement of Policy AS-3 due to proximity to North Reddish Park, and would result in unacceptable noise and disturbance to nearby residents that cannot be adequately mitigated.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy AS-3Policy SIE-1Policy SIE-3Policy CDH1.2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

78 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266008381
    15 St Matthews Road, Edgeley, Stockport, SK3 9EZ
  2. Dismissed16 July 20266008255
    45 Finney Lane, Heald Green, Cheadle, SK8 3DY
  3. Dismissed16 July 20266008254
    2 Arden Close, Heald Green, Cheadle, SK8 3NF
  4. Notice varied and upheld19 February 20263360424
    31 Arundel Avenue, Hazel Grove, Stockport, SK7 5LB
  5. Allowed14 January 20263368530
    Cheadle Heath Works, Stockport Road, Cheadle Heath, SK3 0PR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.