Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 December 20223299946

125 Packington Street, London, N1 7EA

Planning appeal 3299946 at 125 Packington Street, London, N1 7EA (London Borough of Islington) was dismissed on 21 December 2022 by Inspector Walker R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether sufficient evidence has been provided to justify the permanent loss of the Public House.

Change of Use of Vacant Public House (Sui Generis) to 2 x 2 bedroom apartments (Use Class C3)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Walker R
Postcode
N1 7EA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether sufficient evidence has been provided to justify the permanent loss of the Public House
  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Duncan Terrace/Colebrooke Row Conservation Area
  • Whether the proposal would result in an acceptable standard of accommodation with particular reference to the use of space, layout, external amenity provision, outlook and light

What decided it

The failure to provide sufficient marketing evidence to justify the permanent loss of the public house, combined with less than substantial but unbalanced harm to the conservation area, meant the proposal conflicted with the development plan with no material considerations to outweigh it.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy HC7Policy DM4.10Policy D3Policy D4Policy CS8Policy CS9Policy DM2.1Policy DM2.3Policy DM3.4Policy DM3.5Policy D6Policy CS12
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 202Paragraph 125Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 821 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Islington

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed22 October 20266006605
    131 - 132 Upper Street, London, N1 1QP
  2. Allowed16 October 20266005930
    30 Sekforde Street, London, EC1R 0HH
  3. Allowed24 September 20266005904
    Upper Flat, 23 Ronalds Road, London, N5 1XF
  4. Dismissed24 September 20266005590
    2 Highbury Grove Court, Highbury Grove, London, N5 2NG
  5. Notice upheld23 September 20263364241
    First and Second Floors, 72 Prebend Street, Islington, London, N1 8PR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.