Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 November 20223299971

Area of grass verge near to footpath lying off the junction of Sutton Road, and Mill Lane, Cookham

5G telecoms installation: H3G Phase 8 15m high street pole c/w wrap-around cabinet and 3 further additional equipment cabinets

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Davies H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of designated and non-designated heritage assets, and, if any harm would occur, whether it is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed, taking into account any suitable alternative sites

What decided it

The siting and appearance would cause significant harm to character and appearance and less than substantial harm to heritage assets, and this harm was not outweighed by the moderate public benefits, particularly given the failure to demonstrate that less harmful alternatives had been fully explored.

Framework references: 199, 202, 203, 114, 115, 117

Plan policies cited: Policy IF7

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.