Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 January 20233300058

Ulster 174 Princes Avenue , Walderslade, Chatham, Kent, ME5 8AL

Planning appeal 3300058 at Ulster 174 Princes Avenue , Walderslade, Chatham, Kent, ME5 8AL (Medway Council) was dismissed on 24 January 2023 by Inspector Grierson E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on character and appearance of the surrounding area.

the erection of 2no. semi-detached dwellings, each comprising 3no. bedrooms with associated parking, access, infrastructure and landscaping

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Grierson E
Postcode
ME5 8AL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring dwellings in relation to privacy and whether it would provide satisfactory living conditions for the future occupiers in relation to outlook

What decided it

The significant harm to character and appearance from the scale, location and isolated nature of the proposed dwellings in an undeveloped rear garden environment substantially and demonstrably outweighs the limited housing benefits, even in the context of a shortfall in housing land supply.

The significant harm to character and appearance substantially and demonstrably outweighs the limited benefits of two dwellings and the housing land supply shortfall, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy BNE1Policy BNE2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 69Paragraph 126Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

56 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Medway

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed26 October 20266014100
    130 High Street, Gillingham, ME7 1AS
  2. Dismissed9 October 20266009269
    Land Between Cumberland Road and Medway Road, Gillingham, ME7 1NH
  3. Dismissed2 October 20266009769
    Street Record, Callis Way, Parkwood, Gillingham, ME8 9PA
  4. Dismissed21 September 20266004691
    Land South of Woodview House, Perry Hill, Cliffe Woods, ME3 7TX
  5. Dismissed6 August 20266007660
    180-182 Luton Road, Chatham, ME4 5BP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.