Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 February 20233300120

The Ballroom, St Bernards Hospital, Uxbridge Road, Southall, UB1 3HW

Planning appeal 3300120 at The Ballroom, St Bernards Hospital, Uxbridge Road, Southall, UB1 3HW (London Borough of Ealing) was dismissed on 20 February 2023 by Inspector Rose P, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The possible implications of the proposal for the significance of the designated heritage asset of St Bernard's Hospital, a Grade II listed building.

conversion of a ballroom at first floor level to 9 affordable residential homes

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Rose P
Postcode
UB1 3HW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The possible implications of the proposal for the significance of the designated heritage asset of St Bernard's Hospital, a Grade II listed building

What decided it

The very significant, though less than substantial, harm to the significance of the Grade II listed St Bernard's Hospital was not outweighed by the public benefits of the scheme.

the significant public benefits (affordable housing delivery, brownfield re-use and economic benefits) were outweighed by the very significant less-than-substantial harm to the significance of the listed building

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 7CPolicy HC1Policy 1.2Policy GG4Policy GG2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 60Paragraph 120Paragraph 189Paragraph 197Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 201Paragraph 202
Judgments
Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Selby DC and UK Coal Mining Ltd, J.P.L. 2009, 10, 1326-1335

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

223 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Ealing

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266014340
    21 Northcote Avenue, Southall, UB1 2AX
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266013917
    94 Pitshanger Lane, Ealing, London, W5 1QX
  3. Dismissed27 October 20266012839
    Station Parade, Advertising Right Adj 1 Uxbridge Road, Ealing, W5 3LD
  4. Dismissed22 October 20266011704
    62, Cornwall Avenue, Southall, UB1 2TG
  5. Dismissed12 October 20266012335
    Land Rear of 4 Greenford Road, Greenford, UB6 9AT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.