Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 November 20223300447

Land to the Rear of 9 Meadow Close , Chislehurst , Bromley, BR7 6JB

Planning appeal 3300447 at Land to the Rear of 9 Meadow Close , Chislehurst , Bromley, BR7 6JB (London Borough of Bromley) was dismissed on 21 November 2022 by Inspector Wood T, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effects of the proposal on the character of the area.

the construction of a pair of two-storey, semi-detached, 2 bedroom houses

Authority
London Borough of Bromley
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wood T
Postcode
BR7 6JB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the proposal on the character of the area
  • The effects of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbours
  • The effects on a tree which is the subject of a TPO
  • The effects of the proposal in relation to parking and access

What decided it

The cumulative environmental and social harm from character erosion, neighbour impacts, and threat to the protected tree significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest benefits of the scheme even under the tilted balance.

The considerable environmental harm (character and tree) and social harm (neighbours' living conditions) significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest benefits of two new homes, even applying the tilted balance under paragraph 11d)ii of the Framework

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 4Policy 8Policy 37Policy 73
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

349 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Bromley

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Planning permission granted17 June 20263351724
    Nicholas James Care Homes Ltd, 30 Station Road, Orpington, BR6 0SA
  2. Allowed28 May 20266007385
    223 Crofton Lane, Petts Wood, Orpington, Kent, BR6 0BL
  3. Dismissed19 May 20266001435
    Former Public Conveniences, 2 High Street, Green Street Green, Orpington, BR6 6BQ
  4. Dismissed12 May 20266002512
    54 Stanley Road, Bromley, BR2 9JH
  5. Dismissed11 May 20266005255
    269 Eden Park Avenue, Beckenham, Bromley, BR3 3JN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.