Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 March 20233300749

Yalding Hill, Yalding, Maidstone, ME18 6AL

15.0m phase 8 monopole c/w wrapround cabinet at base and associated ancillary works

Authority
Maidstone Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Smith D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area and on pedestrian safety
  • Whether any harm would be outweighed by the need for the monopole and equipment to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The proposal would cause harm to character and appearance of the area and it has not been adequately demonstrated that there are no suitable alternatives to serve the area, especially the commercial buildings along Yalding Hill.

Framework references: 117

Plan policies cited: Policy DM25

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.