Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed17 January 20233301033

Ground Floor, 262 Church Street, London, N9 9HQ

Planning appeal 3301033 at Ground Floor, 262 Church Street, London, N9 9HQ (London Borough of Enfield) was allowed on 17 January 2023 by Inspector Rafferty C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is an acceptable location for the proposed use as a hot food takeaway, having particular regard to the health and wellbeing of local schoolchildren.

Change of use of part of ground floor from Cafe (Use class E(b) to Hot food takeaway (Sui Generis) involving installation of extractor flue and alterations to shop front including and retractable awning (PART RETROSPECTIVE)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Change of use
Inspector
Rafferty C
Postcode
N9 9HQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site is an acceptable location for the proposed use as a hot food takeaway, having particular regard to the health and wellbeing of local schoolchildren
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of residents of surrounding properties, with regard to noise and disturbance, odour, and vibration
  • the effect of the proposed development on highway safety

What decided it

The proposal complies with the development plan policies, particularly Policy DMD32 regarding distance from school entrances measured from the pupil entrance, and subject to conditions controlling fumes, noise and vibration, would not significantly harm living conditions or highway safety.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DMD32Policy D3Policy D14Policy CP32Policy DMD68Policy CP30Policy D4Policy T5Policy T6Policy CP24Policy CP25Policy DMD45Policy DMD48

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

421 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  2. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  3. Allowed28 August 20266008361
    9 The Spinney, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LL
  4. Dismissed6 August 20266006826
    28 The Crest, London, N13 5JT
  5. Dismissed20 July 20266010350
    19 Wilbury Way, London, N18 1BU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.