Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 August 20223301147

3 Church Hill, LONDON, N21 1LS

the erection of a first-floor side extension

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Allan J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The side extension creates a terracing effect by substantially reducing the gap between the two properties and disrupting the symmetry of the distinctive group of four dwellings, causing unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area in conflict with the development plan and the Framework.

Framework references: 2

Plan policies cited: DMD 14, DMD 6, DMD 8, DMD 37, Core Policy 30, Policy D4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.