Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 January 20233302362

NEW HAMPTON ROAD W, CLAREGATE, TETTENHALL, WV6 0JB

a 15.0m Phase 9 super slimline monopole and associated ancillary works

Authority
Wolverhampton City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Change of use
Inspector
Jones D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area, having particular regard to whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Tettenhall Road Conservation Area
  • if any harm is identified, whether that harm would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The visual harm caused to the character and appearance of the Tettenhall Road Conservation Area by the siting and prominence of the monopole and cabinets was not outweighed by the public benefits of 5G provision or justified by adequate consideration of alternative sites.

Framework references: 199, 202, 117

Plan policies cited: CSP4, ENV2, ENV3, D4, D6, D7, D9, D12, HE1, HE3, HE4, HE5, N7, EP20

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.