Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed27 September 20233302413

Land Rear of De Vigier Avenue, Saffron Walden

outline planning permission with all matters reserved except for access for the erection of up to 12 dwellings with associated landscaping, parking and supporting infrastructure

Authority
Uttlesford District Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Wallace J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on biodiversity with particular regard to calcareous grassland and common lizard
  • the need to secure contributions towards off-site highway improvements, education, affordable housing, public open space and biodiversity

What decided it

The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply engaged the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework, and the limited adverse impacts of the development did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of housing supply and biodiversity enhancement.

The proposal conflicts with the development plan but benefits from the presumption in favour of sustainable development under paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework; the limited adverse impacts do not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of housing delivery, economic benefits and biodiversity net gain, and the appeal is allowed.

Framework references: 57, 98, 130, 179, 11

Plan policies cited: ULP Policy S7, ULP Policy GEN7, ULP Policy GEN2, ULP Policy GEN6, ULP Policy GEN1, SWNP Policy SW2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.