Planning appeal decision
32 Avenue Road, London, N14 4EE
Planning appeal 3302638 at 32 Avenue Road, London, N14 4EE (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 25 October 2022 by Inspector Colebourne S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed access on highway safety.
dropped kerb for vehicle crossover
- Authority
- London Borough of Enfield
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Colebourne S
- Postcode
- N14 4EE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed access on highway safety
What decided it
The proposed access would fail to meet policy DMD46 criterion f) requiring forward gear entry/exit, and would have a significantly harmful cumulative impact on highway safety, pedestrian safety, and traffic flow on a classified road with frequent bus services.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CP24CP30DMD37DMD46
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Enfield
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed21 October 202660105412 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
- Allowed20 October 2026600977328 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
- Allowed28 August 202660083619 The Spinney, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LL
- Dismissed20 July 2026601035019 Wilbury Way, London, N18 1BU
- Dismissed3 June 202660048031 Moffat Road, London, N13 4SA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®