Planning appeal decision
Land at Griffiths Drive, Ashmore Park, Wednesfield, Wolverhampton
Planning appeal 3302722 at Land at Griffiths Drive, Ashmore Park, Wednesfield, Wolverhampton (Wolverhampton City Council) was allowed on 2 February 2023 by Inspector Jones D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and, if any harm is identified, whether it would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives.
the “installation of a 15-metre-high monopole, 4 no. equipment cabinets and development work ancillary thereto
- Authority
- Wolverhampton City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Jones D
- Postcode
- WV11 2JW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and, if any harm is identified, whether it would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives
What decided it
The lack of realistic alternative sites to deliver the improved coverage and capacity, combined with the social and economic benefits of the telecommunications infrastructure, outweighed the moderate harm to character and appearance.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy ENV3Policy CSP4Policy D6Policy D7Policy D9Policy EP20
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 114Paragraph 117
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wolverhampton
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed29 October 20266013350Wergs Road, Wolverhampton, WV6 8QN
- Allowed26 October 20266013623Footpath Outside 43 Dunkley Street, Worverhampton, WV1 4AN
- Allowed26 October 20266013620Footpath Outside 43 Dunkley Street, Worverhampton, WV1 4AN
- Dismissed21 May 20266004247Footpath Outside 1e Clark Road/Tettenhall Road, Tettenhall, Wolverhampton, WV3 9NW
- Dismissed21 May 20266004246Footpath Outside 1e Clark Road/Tettenhall Road, Tettenhall, Wolverhampton, WV3 9NW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®