Planning appeal decision
Land at Griffiths Drive, Ashmore Park, Wednesfield, Wolverhampton
the “installation of a 15-metre-high monopole, 4 no. equipment cabinets and development work ancillary thereto
- Authority
- Wolverhampton City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Jones D
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and, if any harm is identified, whether it would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives
What decided it
The lack of realistic alternative sites to deliver the improved coverage and capacity, combined with the social and economic benefits of the telecommunications infrastructure, outweighed the moderate harm to character and appearance.
Framework references: 114, 117
Plan policies cited: Policy ENV3, Policy CSP4, Policy D6, Policy D7, Policy D9, Policy EP20
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®