Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed2 February 20233302722

Land at Griffiths Drive, Ashmore Park, Wednesfield, Wolverhampton

the “installation of a 15-metre-high monopole, 4 no. equipment cabinets and development work ancillary thereto

Authority
Wolverhampton City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Jones D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and, if any harm is identified, whether it would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The lack of realistic alternative sites to deliver the improved coverage and capacity, combined with the social and economic benefits of the telecommunications infrastructure, outweighed the moderate harm to character and appearance.

Framework references: 114, 117

Plan policies cited: Policy ENV3, Policy CSP4, Policy D6, Policy D7, Policy D9, Policy EP20

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.