Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 December 20223302982

81 Hedge Lane, Enfield, Southgate, N13 5SZ

Planning appeal 3302982 at 81 Hedge Lane, Enfield, Southgate, N13 5SZ (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 5 December 2022 by Inspector Rafferty C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with regard to noise and disturbance.

the Change of use from (Use Class C3) dwelling house to (Use Class C4) house in multiple occupation (retrospective)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Rafferty C
Postcode
N13 5SZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with regard to noise and disturbance
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers, with regard to provision of internal floorspace
  • the distribution of converted properties within the area
  • highway safety, with regard to car parking
  • whether the proposal would make adequate provision for cycle and waste storage

What decided it

The significant harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers through noise and disturbance, combined with inadequate internal floorspace for future occupiers, outweighed the limited benefits of additional housing provision.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP32 of the CSPolicy CP4 of the CSPolicy CP30 of the CSPolicy CP5 of the CSPolicy CP24 of the CSPolicy CP25 of the CSPolicy DMD5 of the DMDPolicy DMD8 of the DMDPolicy DMD37 of the DMDPolicy DMD45 of the DMDPolicy DMD47 of the DMDPolicy D14 of the London PlanPolicy D6 of the London PlanPolicy H2 of the London PlanPolicy H10 of the London PlanPolicy T5 of the London PlanPolicy T6 of the London Plan

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

503 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  2. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  3. Allowed28 August 20266008361
    9 The Spinney, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LL
  4. Dismissed6 August 20266006826
    28 The Crest, London, N13 5JT
  5. Dismissed20 July 20266010350
    19 Wilbury Way, London, N18 1BU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.