Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 December 20223303135

Land at the Rear of 1A Conway Road, Enfield, London, N14 7BB

Planning appeal 3303135 at Land at the Rear of 1A Conway Road, Enfield, London, N14 7BB (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 12 December 2022 by Inspector Rafferty C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Lakes Estate Conservation Area.

the redevelopment of site to provide one detached single- family dwelling, with amenity space, new crossover, parking for one car, cycle and refuse storage

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Rafferty C
Postcode
N14 7BB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Lakes Estate Conservation Area
  • The effect of the proposal on trees
  • The effect of the proposal on highway safety
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with regard to privacy and outlook
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers, with regards to privacy and light
  • Whether adequate sustainable urban drainage arrangements are proposed

What decided it

The failure to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the conservation area, combined with significant adverse effects on highway safety and the privacy of future occupiers, outweighed the limited benefits of the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CP30CP31CP25CP21D1D3D4D8HC1GG6G1G7T4T6.1SI 12SI 13DMD6DMD7DMD8DMD9DMD10DMD37DMD44DMD45DMD46DMD47DMD61DMD80DMD81
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

595 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed7 May 20263336102
    70 Sketty Road, Enfield, EN1 3SF
  2. Allowed24 March 20266003066
    45 Park Road, Enfield, EN3 6SP
  3. Dismissed23 March 20263375785
    5 Cocker Road, Enfield, London, EN1 4QQ
  4. Dismissed17 March 20266003971
    5 Ramscroft Close, London, N9 9JY
  5. Allowed10 March 20266004174
    256 Bury Street West, London, N9 9LB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.