Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 February 20233303929

Area of Footway, Gleadless Common, Sheffield, S12 2UR

a telecommunications installation: proposed ‘slim line’ phase 8 monopole c/w wraparound cabinet at base, 3no. additional ancillary equipment cabinets and associated ancillary works

Authority
Sheffield City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Change of use
Inspector
Wilkinson F

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • if there is any harm, whether this would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed, having regard to the potential availability of alternative sites

What decided it

The significant harm to character and appearance caused by the height, scale and siting of the monopole was not outweighed by the need for the installation or the benefits of improved 5G coverage, particularly given that alternative sites had not been adequately justified as unsuitable.

Framework references: 114, 115, 117, 130

Plan policies cited: Policy BE14, Policy H14(l), Policy CS74

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.