Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 April 20233304198

54 Oaks Road, CROYDON, CR0 5HL

side/rear extension; internal alterations; detached games room rear of property

Authority
London Borough of Croydon
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Nilsson A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area
  • If the proposed development is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposed development

What decided it

The proposed development would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt due to its disproportionate size relative to the original building, and the substantial weight to be given to this Green Belt harm was not clearly outweighed by other considerations.

Framework references: 147, 148, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy DM26, Policy SP1.1, Policy SP4.1, Policy SP4.2, Policy D3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.