Planning appeal decision
Little Aston Road, Aldridge, Walsall, WS9 8NJ
Planning appeal 3304491 at Little Aston Road, Aldridge, Walsall, WS9 8NJ (Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council) was allowed on 3 November 2023 by Inspector O'Connor H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposals on the special interest and significance of relevant designated heritage assets.
the refurbishment and alterations to the Manor House to form eight residential flats. Demolition of garage and activity hall in the curtilage of the site. Associated carparking, hard and soft landscaping
- Authority
- Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- O'Connor H
- Postcode
- WS9 8NJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposals on the special interest and significance of relevant designated heritage assets
- The effect of the proposals on the Cannock Chase Special Area of Conservation
What decided it
The absence of a five-year housing land supply triggered the presumption in favour of sustainable development under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework, and the limited less-than-substantial heritage harm was clearly outweighed by the cumulative benefits of eight new dwellings in an accessible location, economic benefits, and heritage enhancements, with adequate mitigation for the Cannock Chase SAC secured.
The less than substantial harm to the listed building as a designated heritage asset was outweighed by public benefits including eight new dwellings, considerable investment in the building's fabric, securing its optimum viable use, and economic benefits; the limited heritage harm was clearly outweighed by housing and economic benefits when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole under the tilted balance.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy ENV2Policy EQ2Policy CSP3Policy CSP4Policy ENV1saved policy ENV23
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 56Paragraph 202
- Judgments
- People over Wind and Sweetman v Coillte Teoranta ECLI:EU:C:2018:244
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Walsall
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed15 October 20266008716Rooftop Food Court, Multi-Storey Car Park, George St, Walsall, Ws1 1RS
- Dismissed9 October 20266012207Land at Barr Lakes Lane, Walsall, WS5 3RB
- Allowed8 October 20266012149225, Lichfield Road, Rushall, WS4 1EA
- Dismissed30 September 2026601387757, Lincoln Road, Walsall, WS1 2DW
- Dismissed29 September 20266008378407 Chester Road, Walsall, WS9 0PH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®